Showing posts with label damien hirst. Show all posts
Showing posts with label damien hirst. Show all posts

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Who Let the Dots Out?

As you all probably know how much I love, adore, and respect the work of Damien Hirst (pass the sick bucket), it is my pleasure to state that his entire spot painting collection(sssssssssssss) from 1986-2011 are being featured at the 11 Gagosian galleries around the world. (For 25 years the man has been spotting around).

To make the already interesting viewing even more exciting, if you make it to all 11 galleries within the span of Jan 12-Feb 18, you could be the proud owner of your very own completely unoriginal spot painting. Additionally, it will be signed by the artist who didn't even create the painting, but rather one of his assistants! (GASPING FOR AIR!)



So little time, soooooooooooo many dots! But don't worry... 3 out of the 11 galleries are in New York (two of which are 3 blocks apart... hmmm, someone didn't take urban planning courses!) Yet be prepared to fly out to Hong Kong, Athens, and Geneva, to name a few. It's so worth it though.... You could be in Rome looking at the artistic gems of Hirst whilst passing on Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel. I mean, there's certainly a more religious, transcendental experience gazing into the hypnotic dots than anything the Renaissance masters had to offer.

Just a skinny man chillin' in the arms of some broad

I'll make you see the light via identical circles in different colors. I am a prophet. 

I'll leave you all with a thought. Which came first? The Gagosian or the Hirst? Whose brilliant idea was it to have the "Complete Spot Challenge?" The businessman or the businessman (aka artist)? Either way, being subjected to owning a spot painting after stalking the spots in 3 different continents is certainly no reward.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Resolutionizing: A Belated, Yet Relevant, Artsy Approach to the New Year.

R.I.P. 2011. 
2011-2011
1. Learn to see the beauty in the art that is Hirst. 

I like unicorns. I just don't like seeing them dead with a pathetically tragic expression. But at least it's a unicorn!

2. Honor the late Elizabeth Taylor by purchasing massive jewels and baubles, perhaps a tiara too, by wearing them as everyday jewelry. 
Bling Blau

3. Finally hang 4 paintings, 2 African masks, 1 Central American mask, and a partridge in a pear tree on my walls. 

4. Stop cringing when people say the Mona Lisa is the most beautiful work of art. Rather keep quiet but silently think... 

I still don't think she has a hot ass though... 

5. Get married 9 times and beat Elizabeth Taylor's record. Hey, if I can't have her jewels, at least I can have the men (and the fun). 
Just need 4 more and let the good times roll. 

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Hell is Repetition.


All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy. 
If you haven't seen "The Shining," a quick back story to the footage is Jack, aka Jack Nicholson, becomes the    winter caretaker of a hotel that is haunted by supernatural spirits. He brings his wife and little son along for the bumpy, and spooky ride. Jack thinks the isolation will be great for his completion of the book he has had great difficulty with writing. Jack goes a little mad and writes the same words "All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy" for seemingly hundreds of pages. Repetition is not only hell but the definition of insanity in many instances. 

The very motion of life, let alone art, is to evolve, progress, react, and adapt. When art is repeated ad nauseam, the world gets smaller and duller. 

Smaller, duller, and dottier. Literally speaking. For most this is probably a pretty recognizable piece from Damien Hirst. Reason it's recognizable? Because Hirst created 1,400 of these 'spot' paintings, which represents 29% of his total output of 4,800 pieces. Hirst feels that he still has some more of the old 'spot' in him as he compares his meager output to Warhol's 10,000 or Picasso's 40,000 works of art. Difference among the three artists, is that the latter two had different images... Dots are dots are dots are...well, dots... 

Yes, I understand that placing 1 1/2 millimeter dots on a seven foot canvas does take quite a bit of time, but is the return on investment worth it at this point? The dots have been done. Yet, Hirst realizes that his spot paintings will always be valued as a commodity.

 “You learn by doing, really. If I put a painting outside a bar at closing time, and it’s still there in the morning, it’s a crap painting. With spot paintings, wherever you leave them, people are going to take them out of the dumpsters. It’s an intrinsic thing that has nothing to do with how many you make.”

Well, indeed Hirst is still profiting off the spot paintings, but are his creative juices flowing? What's the difference between churning out repetitive paintings and going to work everyday and notarizing the same kinds of documents as a government drone? Here we have an art drone, at best --driven by commercialism and less about artistic development. 

If Hirst is not painting dots, he's doing 'spin' paintings, which by the way, I had a 'spin' machine as a kid and could turn out a fierce painting... too bad I missed that bandwagon. 
Or Hirst is placing animals in formaldehyde. 

This allegedly sold for $12 million to hedge fund guru Steve Cohen on the condition that Hirst would not create anymore stuffed sharks. Well, Hirst reneged on that. What can he do, the man loves to copy his own art! And poor Mr. Cohen is sitting with his stuffed shark thinking it's a one-of-a-kind, $12 million work of art... until the next 1,400 are reproduced... 

This leads me to the question... is there some serious pulling the wool over the eyes are what? Does cloning your own artwork make an artist or strategic businessmen? Or both?